“Afternoon Light”, 4,650 x 6,200 pixel digital image, produced using my own abstract image computer program.
The photographs used for creating this month's computer 'paintings' were taken using an Olympus E-30 Digital-SLR camera. The photographs were processed from RAW captures, using Adobe Camera Raw software, and were adjusted to try to reproduce the colours and tones experienced as accurately as possible (within the range of colours and tones available for the medium). The photographs were then loaded into my own computer program (written by me) used for developing 'abstract images'. Usually with my computer program, I would develop images made from a relatively small number of overlapping randomly positioned, randomly rotated, and randomly sized (usually fairly large) rectangles. With this series of images, I used a much larger number of smaller sized rectangles, that seems to give a better sense of 'brush strokes' on a painting. I can colour each rectangle using a variety of methods, such as randomly selecting colours, or reading colours from a similar position of a loaded photograph. I found that I could angle the 'brush strokes' according to the value or hue of a read colour, or from its position on the screen, (or from a combination of all these things).
With this month's series of images, I concentrated on using the colours read from the loaded photographs, but may have modified components of brightness or saturation to those read colours.
Through the development of these images, I added a number of features to my computer program, mainly to do with manipulating the colours being read from the loaded photographs, and controlling the orientation of the rectangles being applied (hopefully you can get a better understanding of this when you see the examples on the first page). As the operator of my program, I was always making decisions about which computer process to use, the parameters applied to each process used, and whether the results worked well enough to keep, or 'undo'. So, each image still reflects my artistic understanding and sense of creativity.
All of the images shown in this month's display are selections made from a range of multiple saved results that use the same photograph as their basis, but use different experiments or combinations of processes to achieve those different results. An important part of the whole process was reviewing the ranges of results for the version (or versions) that felt most interesting/successful. Sometimes further experiments were made to see if I could get closer to a specific kind of result.
I have a simple counter in my program that adds up the number of elements applied to each image, as each image is developed. The number of elements applied to these images certainly varied from one image to another, but were roughly in the range of about 120,000 to over one million elements. The images produced by my computer painting program were quite large, typically about 6,200 pixels x 3,600 pixels in size (enough resolution to print well to poster sizes). They do look more impressive when viewed larger than the images reproduced here in my monthly display.
I am not trying to deceive the viewer into thinking that these images are genuine paintings. The results I was getting from my abstract images development program, tend to look like they are paintings, but that was not the purpose behind developing these images - it was just the way they looked when I was happy with them. As images, these computer-based constructions seem to radiate a better sense of presence than the original photographs used to create these images. They also seem to present a better sense of the real scenes' colours than the original photographs do. I think this is because locally discreet colours are applied to larger shape areas, and these contrast more with other similar areas of slightly different colours.